Out-of-the-box SWMR code pulled from SVN needs a couple of trivial fixes to compile on the most recent GCC. I'm using gcc-5.1.1 from Fedora 22.
Compiling
···
---------
* src/H5FScache.c line 1022: remove extra / in front of the comment, leaving a valid C style comment.
* src/H5HL.c line 369: c++ style comments not allowed in ICO C90. Change to C style comment.
Testing
-------
Documentation states that the "atomic" assumption is expected to fail on ext3/4, and presumably that should be reflected in the atomic_* tests as run by testswmr.sh. I ran testswmr.sh, but was unable to see a failure on ext4, but maybe I don't know what I'm expecting to see.
Where should I see the failure? I would like to understand this failure and test on a couple of other file systems.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hdf-forum [mailto:hdf-forum-bounces@lists.hdfgroup.org] On Behalf Of
Baker, William L Jr CIV USARMY MEDCOM AISR (US)
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:00 PM
To: hdf-forum@lists.hdfgroup.org
Subject: [Hdf-forum] SWMR issues
Out-of-the-box SWMR code pulled from SVN needs a couple of trivial fixes
to compile on the most recent GCC. I'm using gcc-5.1.1 from Fedora 22.
Compiling
---------
* src/H5FScache.c line 1022: remove extra / in front of the comment,
leaving a valid C style comment.
* src/H5HL.c line 369: c++ style comments not allowed in ICO C90. Change
to C style comment.
Testing
-------
Documentation states that the "atomic" assumption is expected to fail on
ext3/4, and presumably that should be reflected in the atomic_* tests as
run by testswmr.sh. I ran testswmr.sh, but was unable to see a failure on
ext4, but maybe I don't know what I'm expecting to see.
Where should I see the failure? I would like to understand this failure
and test on a couple of other file systems.
